The content lead at a mid-sized fund house types “how does a SIP top-up work” into Google and finds three of the firm’s own pages on the first two screens: an old blog post, a product page and a press note about the feature. Each gives the minimum amount slightly differently. The AI answer above them quotes a comparison site. The firm has written about SIPs for years and still does not own the topic. A finance content hub fixes that by deciding, once, which page answers which question, and getting compliance to approve the whole set.
What you need before you start a content hub
Before the first draft, a content hub needs named owners and an agreed approval route, plus a short list of inputs. Skip any of them and the hub turns into another folder of blog posts.
Two terms first. A content hub is a group of pages on one topic, organised around a pillar page that covers the topic broadly and links to spoke pages, sometimes called cluster pages, that each answer one specific question. A claims register is a spreadsheet listing every number, rate, rule and product feature the hub states, with its source and the date compliance approved it.
Four people own the work. Name them in writing before the topic is chosen.
- Content owner. Usually the content or digital lead. Decides the page list, keeps the claims register and chases reviews.
- Subject expert. A product manager, fund manager, underwriter or credit head who checks facts. Tone is not their job.
- Compliance reviewer. Approves claims and disclaimers, and agrees a review turnaround the team can plan around.
- SEO or web owner. Controls URLs, redirects, page templates and internal links.
Agree two approvals up front. The first is the page list itself: compliance should see the topics, and the line between education pages and product pages, before writing starts. The second is the page template, with the disclaimer, the brand lockup and the reviewer line fixed, so nobody re-approves the same footer on every spoke.
The inputs are search data from Google Search Console, the questions your call centre, branch staff or relationship managers hear every week, your existing pages on the topic, and the product documents compliance has already cleared. The last input matters most. In our experience, a hub written from approved documents moves through review faster, because the reviewer recognises the language. Our content marketing playbook for financial services covers the wider approval set-up if your team is starting from scratch.
Phase one: the topic you can defend decides whether the hub works
Choose a topic where your firm sells a product and has an expert who can explain it, then map every question a buyer asks about it. Pick wrong here and no amount of linking will rescue the hub.
- Choose the topic. Good hub topics sit between a product you sell and a question people ask before they buy: SIPs for a fund house, term cover for a life insurer, business loans for an NBFC (non-banking financial company), merchant payouts for a payments firm. Too broad, such as “investing”, and you compete with every personal finance publisher in India. Too narrow, such as one fund’s exit load, and there is nothing to cluster. Our working test is whether you can list at least a dozen distinct questions a customer would type; it is a house rule, not an industry standard.
- Map and label the questions. Pull queries from Search Console, the call centre log and sales calls. Run the same questions through ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity and Google’s AI Mode, and note which pages they cite. Group the questions by intent: what it is, how it works, what it costs, how to compare, how to start. Each group becomes a spoke, or a section of the pillar if the answer is short. Then mark every question as education or product.
That last label is the regulator-driven decision that saves the most review time. SEBI’s FAQs for mutual fund intermediaries say the standard risk disclaimer applies to any communication by or on behalf of a fund house that may influence an investment decision, while corporate branding that solicits no investment does not need it (SEBI FAQs, September 2024). So a spoke that explains how SIP top-ups work in general can be planned as an education page, while a spoke that ends by recommending a named scheme is an advertisement. SEBI’s advertisement code wants the standard warning in that ad with no words added or removed. Decide it on the map, and the template for each page follows.
Insurers face a different version of the same call. IRDAI’s 2024 regulations on protecting policyholders’ interests require every insurer advertisement to show the insurer’s registered name with its trade name or logo prominently, and advertisements issued through distribution channels need the insurer’s written approval before issue (IRDAI regulations, 2024). If agents, brokers or bancassurance partners will reuse your spokes, build the lockup into the template and route partner versions through written approval from the first page.
Ask your compliance team to confirm the label on each question. Their call decides the template, and you want it before a writer has drafted the page.
A hub owns a topic when every question has exactly one approved page, and everyone in the firm knows which one.
Phase two: the pillar carries the claims and the spokes carry the detail
The pillar page answers the whole topic at a depth a newcomer can follow, and hands each narrow question to a spoke. Write it first, but publish it only when enough spokes exist for its links to go somewhere.
- Write the pillar. Open with an answer of two or three sentences that an engine can lift whole. Define the topic term in one plain sentence. Give one section per question group, each with a short answer and a link to its spoke. Add a table that compares options or sets out steps. Every number on the page comes from the claims register, with no exceptions for the introduction.
- Write the spokes. One question per page, the answer in the first sentence under the heading, a worked example where the topic allows, and a link back to the pillar in the first few paragraphs. Use the pillar’s terms. If the pillar says “term cover”, the spoke should not switch to “term assurance” without saying they mean the same product.
Google’s guidance on helpful, reliable content treats topics that can affect people’s finances as “Your Money or Your Life” topics, and its systems give extra weight to experience, expertise, authoritativeness and trust on them (Google Search Central). For a finance hub, that means a byline or reviewer line where readers expect one, a date the page was last checked, and sources a reader can open. A spoke that links to the regulator’s own page holds up better with a sceptical reader than one that links to a news summary.
Lending hubs have a fixed reference point. RBI requires lenders to give borrowers a Key Facts Statement in a standard format, including the annual percentage rate, before a retail or MSME loan contract is signed. For commercial banks the rule now sits in RBI’s November 2025 Responsible Business Conduct Directions (RBI Directions, 2025); other lenders should check the Directions that apply to them. A spoke on APR should use the same definition and the same style of arithmetic the lender’s statement uses. A borrower who reads the blog and then the statement should meet one number explained one way.
One claims register serves the whole hub. When a fee, rate or rule changes, you edit one line and the register lists every page that carries it. Without the register, a rate change means a search across every page on the topic and a guess about which ones were missed.
SIGNALNewsletter by Yamm Labs
The next piece, straight to your inbox.
New writing on BFSI brands, B2B and influencer marketing, and AI search.
One click to unsubscribe. Privacy policy
Phase three: links and refreshes keep the hub in Google and AI answers
A hub whose pages are not linked as a set is a list of pages. A hub that is not refreshed stops being cited soon after a rule or rate changes.
- Link the set. The pillar links to every spoke, every spoke links back to the pillar, and spokes link to their neighbours where a reader needs the next answer. Google says it uses links as a signal of relevance and to find new pages to crawl, and that every page you care about should have a link from at least one other page on your site (Google Search Central). Write anchor text that names the destination. “How SIP top-ups are taxed” tells a reader and a crawler far more than “read more”.
- Refresh on a schedule. Give every page a review date: in our practice, quarterly for pages with rates or rules and twice a year for explainers, though no regulator sets that cadence. Log every change with the date, editor and approver. When a regulator replaces or consolidates a rule, update every page that cites the old one in the same week.
Two recent changes show why the refresh step exists. IRDAI’s 2021 advertisement regulations were replaced by its 2024 policyholder-protection regulations, and in November 2025 RBI issued new conduct Directions for each type of lender, which now hold the Key Facts Statement rule for commercial banks. A hub page still quoting the old instrument tells readers and reviewers that nobody is watching it.
AI answers need no separate trick. Google says there are no additional requirements to appear in AI Overviews or AI Mode beyond being indexed and eligible to show with a snippet, and that these features may run several related searches across subtopics to build one response (Google Search Central). Our reading is that this is why hubs help. When an engine searches the subtopics of SIPs, a hub gives it one approved page per subtopic from the same publisher, with the same terms and the same numbers.
Our own Finance Social Media Questions page shows the question-led format on a single URL: 100 questions in ten sections of ten, each section headed by a buyer’s question and each answer a short paragraph. A content hub spreads the same logic across many URLs, so each answer can go deeper and be updated without touching the rest.
How long a content hub takes and who signs off
A first content hub, one pillar with its first set of spokes, usually takes about a quarter from topic to linked set in our experience. Review time decides most of that, not writing time. The timings below are typical practice in our work, not a regulator’s standard.
| Step | Owner | Typical time | Who signs off | Artefact to keep |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Choose the topic | Content owner, with the product head | About a week | Marketing head | Topic note naming the product, the scope and what is out of scope |
| 2. Map and label questions | Content owner and SEO owner | One to two weeks | Compliance confirms each education or product label | Question map with intent group, label and target URL |
| 3. Write the pillar | Writer and subject expert | Two to three weeks, including review | Subject expert for facts, compliance for claims | Approved pillar and the first version of the claims register |
| 4. Write the spokes | Writers and subject expert | One or two spokes a week | Compliance, per spoke | Approved spokes, register updates, approval emails |
| 5. Link the set | SEO or web owner | About a week after the spokes go live | Content owner | Link map showing every pillar-to-spoke and spoke-to-spoke link |
| 6. Refresh | Content owner and compliance reviewer | Quarterly review cycle | Compliance for any changed claim | Dated change log and the updated register |
Sign-off splits three ways. Compliance signs off claims and disclaimers. The subject expert signs off accuracy. The content owner signs off the page list, the template and the links. Write this split down, because a page that two people each think the other approved is how errors reach a live URL.
Keep the approval emails with the register. When an auditor or a regulator asks who approved a line on a spoke, the answer should take minutes to find.
How to tell the content hub worked
A hub has worked when the topic’s searches land on the page you chose for them, engines cite those pages, and review gets faster with each new spoke. Track these measures from the first month.
- Query-to-page match. The share of mapped queries in Search Console where the most-clicked page is the page you assigned. It shows whether your own pages still compete with each other.
- Cluster impressions and clicks. Totals for the mapped queries, compared quarter on quarter. It shows reach, and whether new spokes add to it.
- AI citation rate. The share of a fixed prompt panel, run monthly in the main AI assistants, whose answers cite a hub page. It shows whether engines treat you as a source. Answers vary from run to run, so read the trend.
- Review cycle time. Days from draft sent to approval, per spoke. It should fall as the claims register fills with approved lines.
- Assisted conversions. Sessions that touched a hub page before a lead form, an application or an account opening. Attribution here is rough, so treat it as a direction.
AI citation rate = prompts in the panel whose answer cites a hub page ÷ total prompts in the panel
Keep the prompt panel fixed for at least two quarters. Changing the prompts every month makes the trend meaningless, and it is the trend you will defend to a CFO.
What to do when a step fails
Most hub failures show up early in data you already have. Fix the step that failed before you add more pages.
Two of your pages rank for the same question. That is cannibalisation, and it usually goes back to step 2: the question was never assigned to one URL. Merge the weaker page into the stronger one, redirect the old address, and update the question map and the register.
Compliance rejects the same spoke twice. The question probably sits on the line between education and product. Re-label it, switch it to the right template, and resubmit with every claim marked against its register line.
Spokes get impressions but few clicks. The snippet may already answer the question, which is fine for a definition and poor for a decision. Give the page something a snippet cannot hold, such as a comparison table, a worked example or a calculator.
Engines cite a comparison site and skip you. Check that the answer sits in plain text near the top of your page, that the page is indexed, and that your facts match what the regulator’s own pages say. A hub page with the answer buried under a hero banner is easy for an engine to pass over.
The hub stalls after the pillar. Usually the writer is waiting for the subject expert. Book a fixed weekly half hour with the expert and bring the questions in writing.
What to tell your compliance team about the content hub
Compliance teams approve hubs faster when they see the whole plan once. Here is a note you can adapt: “We are building one pillar page and a set of spoke pages on a single topic. Every number, rate and rule on these pages will come from a claims register that you approve line by line before drafting. Each page is labelled education or product on the question map, and product pages use the template with the full disclaimer. Every page carries a review date, and every change is logged with its approver.”
This is general guidance, not legal advice; your compliance team decides. If your team wants support to plan or write the hub, our content marketing work for financial brands starts with the question map and the claims register.
People also ask
What is a content hub in financial services marketing?
A content hub is a set of pages on one topic, built around a pillar page that covers the topic broadly and links to spoke pages that each answer one question. In financial services, every claim across the set comes from one approved claims register, so the pages agree with each other and with the product documents.
How many pages does a finance content hub need?
No fixed number applies. A hub needs one pillar and enough spokes for every question on your map to have one page, which for a single product topic often means a dozen or more in our work. Start with the spokes that answer the most-asked questions and add the rest over the following quarters.
Does a content hub help a brand appear in AI answers?
It can help, though no one can promise a citation. Google says AI Overviews and AI Mode have no additional requirements beyond being indexed and eligible to show with a snippet, and that they may search several subtopics to build an answer. A hub gives an engine one clear, consistent page per subtopic.
Does compliance need to approve every page in a content hub?
For a regulated firm, assume yes for any page that may influence a financial decision, since SEBI, for one, treats any fund house communication that may influence an investment decision as an advertisement. Pure education pages may need a lighter review, but your compliance team should make that call on the question map. This is general guidance, not legal advice.
Is your content ready to be built into a hub that owns its topic?
Get a free Fintech Brand Audit across 8 dimensions, plus 3 fixes. No pitch. Run the free Brand Audit →